Repository logo
Home
Research Outputs
Collections
Statistics
Shared Repository Homepage
  1. Home
  2. Cultural Heritage Shared Repository Service
  3. The British Museum
  4. Article
  5. The morphological affinity of the Early Pleistocene footprints from Happisburgh, England, with other footprints of Pliocene, Pleistocene, and Holocene age

The morphological affinity of the Early Pleistocene footprints from Happisburgh, England, with other footprints of Pliocene, Pleistocene, and Holocene age

Resource type
Journal article
Creator (person)
Wiseman, Ashleigh L.A.
Stringer, Chris B.
Ashton, Nick
ORCIDORCID logo
Bennett, Matthew R.
Hatala, Kevin G.
Duffy, Sarah
O'Brien, Thomas
De Groote, Isabelle
Date published
2020
Abstract
Fossil hominin footprints provide a direct source of evidence of locomotor behavior and allow inference of other biological data such as anthropometrics. Many recent comparative analyses of hominin footprints have used 3D analytical methods to assess their morphological affinities, comparing tracks from different locations and/or time periods. However, environmental conditions can sometimes preclude 3D digital capture, as was the case at Happisburgh (England) in 2013. Consequently, we use here a 2D geometric morphometric approach to investigate the evolutionary context of the Happisburgh tracks. The comparative sample of hominin tracks comes from eight localities that span a broad temporal range from the Pliocene to Late Holocene. The results show disparity in the shapes of tracks ascribed to hominins from the Pliocene (presumably Australopithecus afarensis), Pleistocene (presumably Homo erectus and Homo antecessor), and Holocene (Homo sapiens). Three distinct morphological differences are apparent between time samples: changes in adduction of the hallux, changes in the shape and position of the medial longitudinal arch impression, and apparent changes in foot proportions. Linear dimensions classified the potential H. antecessor tracks from Happisburgh as being most similar to the presumed H. erectus prints from Ileret. We demonstrate using 2D geometric morphometric methods and linear dimensions that the Happisburgh tracks are morphologically similar to other presumed Homo tracks and differ from the Laetoli footprints. The probable functional implications of these results fit well with previous comparative analyses of hominin tracks at other sites.
Creator (organisation)
Wiseman, Ashleigh L.A.
Stringer, Chris B.
Ashton, Nick
Bennett, Matthew R.
Hatala, Kevin G.
Duffy, Sarah
O'Brien, Thomas
De Groote, Isabelle
Project(s)
Pathways to Ancient Britain
Editor
Duffy
Funder
Funder nameAwards
Liverpool John Moores University
Calleva Foundation
Human Origins Research Fund
Natural Environment Research Council grants
NE/M021459/1
Journal title
Journal of Human Evolution
Volume
144
Article number
102776
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Place of publication
Amsterdam
ISSN
0047-2484
Official URL
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2020.102776
Related URL
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0047248420300373
DOI
10.1016/j.jhevol.2020.102776
Keywords
Hominins; fossilized footprints; geometric morphometrics; foot anatomy; functional morphology
Managed by the British Library and supported by the AHRC

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • End User Agreement
  • About
  • Contact
  • Help
Repository logo COAR Notify