Socio-cultural challenges in collections digital infrastructures

Humbel, Marco; Nyhan, Julianne; Pearlman, Nina; Vlachidis, Andreas; Hill, JD; Flinn, Andrew

Socio-cultural challenges in collections digital infrastructures

Download

Name

Socio-cultural_challenges_collections_digital_infrastructures_pre_print.pdf

Description

visibility:open

Size

586.35 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (CRC64NVME)

4fGkXRLr24U=

Resource type

Journal article

Creator (person)

Humbel, Marco

ORCID

Nyhan, Julianne

Pearlman, Nina

Vlachidis, Andreas

ORCID

Hill, JD

Flinn, Andrew

Date published

September 3, 2024

Abstract

This paper aims to explore the accelerations and constraints libraries, archives, museums and heritage organisations (“collections-holding organisations”) face in their role as collection data providers for digital infrastructures. To date, digital infrastructures operate within the cultural heritage domain typically as data aggregation platforms, such as Europeana or Art UK. Design/methodology/approach Semi-structured interviews with 18 individuals in 8 UK collections-holding organisations and 2 international aggregators. Findings Discussions about digital infrastructure development often lay great emphasis on questions and problems that are technical and legal in nature. As important as technical and legal matters are, more latent, yet potent challenges exist too. Though less discussed in the literature, collections-holding organisations' capacity to participate in digital infrastructures is dependent on a complex interplay of funding allocation across the sector, divergent traditions of collection description and disciplinaries’ idiosyncrasies. Accordingly, we call for better social-cultural and trans-sectoral (collections-holding organisations, universities and technological providers) understandings of collection data infrastructure development. Research limitations/implications The authors recommend developing more understanding of the social-cultural aspects (e.g. disciplinary conventions) and their impact on collection data dissemination. More studies on the impact and opportunities of unified collections for different audiences and collections-holding organisations themselves are required too. Practical implications Sustainable financial investment across the heritage sector is required to address the discrepancies between different organisation types in their capacity to deliver collection data. Smaller organisations play a vital role in diversifying the (digital) historical canon, but they often struggle to digitise collections and bring catalogues online in the first place. In addition, investment in existing infrastructures for collection data dissemination and unification is necessary, instead of creating new platforms, with various levels of uptake and longevity. Ongoing investments in collections curation and high-quality cataloguing are prerequisites for a sustainable heritage sector and collection data infrastructures. Investments in the sustainability of infrastructures are not a replacement for research and vice versa. Social implications The authors recommend establishing networks where collections-holding organisations, technology providers and users can communicate their experiences and needs in an ongoing way and influence policy. Originality/value To date, the research focus on developing collection data infrastructures has tended to be on the drive to adopt specific technological solutions and copyright licensing practices. This paper offers a critical and holistic analysis of the dispersed experience of collections-holding organisations in their role as data providers for digital infrastructures. The paper contributes to the emerging understanding of the latent factors that make infrastructural endeavours in the heritage sector complex undertakings.